Peer Review Policy
We follow a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the highest standards of academic integrity, transparency, and quality.
Process Overview:
1. Submission: Authors submit their manuscript by email to [email protected], ensuring the anonymity of both the author and reviewers throughout the process. The editorial team will acknowledge receipt of the manuscript within, and the manuscript will be sent for peer review by experts in the relevant field.
2. Initial Screening: The editorial team performs an initial screening to check the manuscript's alignment with the journal’s scope and compliance with ethical standards.
3. Reviewer Selection: Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. Reviewers are carefully selected based on their academic qualifications, research background, and familiarity with the topic.
4. Double-Blind Review:
5. Reviewer Reports: Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on originality, methodological rigor, clarity, relevance, and contribution to the field. They provide detailed comments and recommendations for improvement, along with their decision (accept, revise, or reject).
6. Decision: The editorial board assesses the reviewers' feedback and makes a final decision. In case of conflicting reviewer recommendations, a third reviewer may be consulted.
7. Revisions: If revisions are required, authors must submit a revised manuscript addressing the reviewers' comments. The revised version may undergo further review depending on the extent of the changes.
8. Final Decision: After satisfactory revisions, the editorial team makes the final decision to accept or reject the manuscript for publication.
Ethical Guidelines:
We value transparency and uphold a stringent review process to maintain the academic integrity of our journal.
Process Overview:
1. Submission: Authors submit their manuscript by email to [email protected], ensuring the anonymity of both the author and reviewers throughout the process. The editorial team will acknowledge receipt of the manuscript within, and the manuscript will be sent for peer review by experts in the relevant field.
2. Initial Screening: The editorial team performs an initial screening to check the manuscript's alignment with the journal’s scope and compliance with ethical standards.
3. Reviewer Selection: Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. Reviewers are carefully selected based on their academic qualifications, research background, and familiarity with the topic.
4. Double-Blind Review:
- Reviewers do not know the identity of the authors.
- Authors do not know the identity of the reviewers.
5. Reviewer Reports: Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on originality, methodological rigor, clarity, relevance, and contribution to the field. They provide detailed comments and recommendations for improvement, along with their decision (accept, revise, or reject).
6. Decision: The editorial board assesses the reviewers' feedback and makes a final decision. In case of conflicting reviewer recommendations, a third reviewer may be consulted.
7. Revisions: If revisions are required, authors must submit a revised manuscript addressing the reviewers' comments. The revised version may undergo further review depending on the extent of the changes.
8. Final Decision: After satisfactory revisions, the editorial team makes the final decision to accept or reject the manuscript for publication.
Ethical Guidelines:
- Our peer review process adheres to ethical standards set by COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics), ensuring fairness, confidentiality, and objectivity throughout.
We value transparency and uphold a stringent review process to maintain the academic integrity of our journal.
